Object Lessons: You Should Be Angry About This Edition

DHS plans to separate migrant children from their parents at border crossings. This is disgusting on so many levels, but particularly hair-raising because our federal government has a history not only of failing to keep track of children under its care (1500 kids “missing” in 2017) but also has actually placed some migrant children under the care of traffickers, as with these Guatemalan teens forced to work on a chicken farm in Ohio by threat of death. H/T nicoleandmaggie for boosting the signal on this one. Call your senators to voice that both the separation itself and the lack of oversight into the welfare for these children are unacceptable.

Editor’s note: Apparently there is some Twitter controversy on the point of children being sufficiently tracked by the Office of Refugee Resettlement. The idea being that undocumented families are purposefully opting out of the system (being unresponsive to HHS oversight and therefore the children become “missing”) and that one should not call for additional scrutiny and monitoring of these families and children. While I agree this is probably what’s happening for the majority of these missing cases, it also gives me great pause to say follow up shouldn’t be necessary. A lot of it really depends on the rigor of the vetting process HHS uses to place children. But absent that information / expertise knowledge, I’ll stick to what I know to be true: i.e. separating children from their families is bogus and awful.

Facebook has come up with a new way to identify and prevent revenge porn from proliferating on its platform. The catch? You have to send FB your nude photos in order for it to work. What could possibly go wrong!?

In other tech surveillance dystopia news, Amazon Echo recorded this family’s conversation and sent it to a random person on their contact list. While these sort of one-off bug stories pop up once in a while, I really worry the extent to which people actively choose to bring these ambient-listening systems into their homes and on their persons. Even for those who choose not to opt in, there’s a constant throng of other people’s devices which I think over time will listen and collect data about us too, with or without our consent.

I love McSweeney’s. Particularly this piece, skewering the “well-meaning” affluent for their NIMBY housing policies: I will do anything to end homelessness except build more homes.

I feel like this always gets lost when people talk about the constraints of being “politically correct” in America:

Sometimes, I like to delude myself that this is a particularly messed up era of politics. But then I remember good old Dick Nixon who, in order to improve his election chances, actively tried to sabotage peace talks to end the Vietnam War:


Object Lessons: Money Diary Edition

Xin recently posted a Man Repeller style money diary on her blog which I loved. I really appreciate the format, especially the emoji summaries for the daily expenses (were my emoji game that strong)! Also I feel like the general tenor of the comments section for MR is a lot less judgmental than the Refinery 29 money diaries (although I must admit R29’s salary negotiation series is pretty great). Along the same lines, I’ve really been enjoying The Guardian’s How I Spend It posts, the UK diarists seem to be from a lot of different financial backgrounds and have incomes/lives which seem much closer to “average” than I what I’ve seen on the American outlets. Also Kitchn’s food budget diaries, which has basically underscored for me that I still spend way too much.

Trying to remember this as I go into the next few months:


This Twitter bot which spits out demographic data of vote-eligible Americans is super trippy. It really goes to show how disparate our views on a number of issues are, how little they align with the dipolar narrative espoused on major media outlets, and– most strikingly– how many people just don’t vote.

I know the media is in a tizzy right now about Facebook’s politics-related scandals, but can we take a moment to reflect that they are still actively allowing landlords to post discriminatorily targeted ads in violation of the Fair Housing Act? Like, I know the motto has long been “move fast and break things” but this is not some deeply complicated technical issue, guys. Come on.

Speaking of tech companies creating their own unregulated surveillance state, did you know that Slack now has a feature where your boss can export your private messages. Neat, huh!?

Given how much interest there has been in tech regulation, I am kind of surprised-unsurprised that there’s been no mainstream coverage of either GDPR or FOSTA, which are going to have a huge effect on internet content in the very immediate future.

For FOSTA in particular: On the one hand, human trafficking is an under-addressed problem in the US and more tech-savvy trafficking rings have long used sites like BackPage to bulk-advertise forced sex work for underage girls (average age of entry into prostitution is fourteen). On the other hand, losing access to online ad agencies are forcing independent sex workers to go back to working with pimps or on the streets– making a currently un-trafficked population become trafficked. Plus, the likelihood of overly aggressive moderation is going to cause spaces where consensual sex connections are currently being formed online to be pushed further to the fringes or go underground. For instance, Craigslist personals has already shut down. One can readily imagine dating sites– OK Cupid, Tinder, Grinder, etc.– to face massive legal difficulties as it becomes increasingly difficult to connect strangers online without an in-depth and costly background check process to ensure they are complying with FOSTA.

In the long-term, though, it seems like what’s most likely is that sex-oriented sites and/or dating sites will end up going off-shore, a la Mastadon (now “Switter”). So the BackPages of the world will crop again, just with servers outside the Untied States. And then we’ll be back to square one, but with a lot of upended lives as collateral damage.

The Atlantic: The Myth of ‘Learning Styles’:

Another study published last year in the British Journal of Psychology found that students who preferred learning visually thought they would remember pictures better, and those who preferred learning verbally thought they’d remember words better. But those preferences had no correlation to which they actually remembered better later on—words or pictures. Essentially, all the “learning style” meant, in this case, was that the subjects liked words or pictures better, not that words or pictures worked better for their memories.
I’ve really been enjoying listening to the FIRE Drill Podcast lately. The hosts, Gwen of Fiery Millennials and J of Millennial Boss make it really clear that they are committed to putting on a diverse array of guests on their show. In a recent episode with ESI Money (now owner of Rockstar Finance), they push him to consider his own biases in selecting content that may not serve the diverse array of the personal finance community.

J also recently posted on her blog a post for girl’s coding boot camp Kode With Klossy— which is offering free scholarships to its camp, getting more young women into the tech pipeline. Definitely something I’d like to see if I can sign Little Sis up for when she’s the appropriate age.

I’ve been thoroughly obsessed with this song since watching Thoroughbreds:

How have I never heard of Lizzo before!? All her music videos are amazing.

Object Lessons: Semiotics of Robot Fashion Edition

Nobody has ever confused me for a Bitcoin bull– the ever-increasing energy consumption of transactions and non-fiatness of the currency has always had me wary. But even supporters, and especially new speculators, should keep in mind that the Bitcoin market is unregulated, shallow, and can be heavily influenced by a handful of investors.

What happened to the legacy premium fashion brands? I bought a Tommy Hilfiger sheath dress a decade ago, wear it weekly, and it still looks brand new! I wonder if clothes from the current class of premium brands– Everlane, Cuyana, DSTLD– will have the same longevity? I expect this new wave of brands will cut quality to lower production costs, particularly during the next recession (thereafter losing their hardcore followers). Everlane’s clothing has rapidly declined in quality over the past few years as they’ve expanded. Maybe that’s just the lifecycle of a premium brand.

When people tell me robots will take all our jobs, I read stuff like this bot-generated Harry Potter chapter and feel a lot more secure.

Speaking of robots, Racked explores how we design and dress female androids reflects whether we’re building artificial intelligence or artificial subservience. (Hint: it’s the latter).

Crinolines: an agent for asserting feminine sexual authority and busting class barriers. Who knew? “Crinoline-clad women, in the reactionary cartoonist’s imagination, crushed men beneath their expanding skirts or caged them within steel frames.” Which kind of reminds me of the women crushing things under their heels trend from the past few years.

In case you haven’t noticed, reality is collapsing into a cheap supermarket tabloid: This article from the NY Times on a secret government U.F.O. research program is the best too-bizarre-to-be-fake news this country needs.

I ❤ Kristen Wiig: